英语词汇.句法以及语义的多视角研究_PDF下载[116MB-百度云]沈莹

本书特色

[

　　《英语词汇、句法以及语义的多视角研究》稿通过对一所普通本科综合院校英语专业大三年级82名学生的产出性词汇水平测试、接受性词汇水平测试、英语专业四级进行分析，考察受试者的产出性词汇量、接受性词汇量以及英语专业四级成绩，揭示受试者产出性词汇量与英语专业四级成绩，接受性词汇量与英语专业四级成绩的相关性。研究中所得数据运用软件SPSS16.0 中的描述统计、皮尔逊相关关系及线性回归分析进行分析。

]

Chapter One An Exploration of the Relationship BetweenEnglish Vocabulary and English Comprehensive Ability1．1 Introduction1．1．1 Background of the Research1．1．2 Purposes of the Research1．1．3 Content of the Research1．2 Literature Review1．2．1 Vocabulary Knowledge1．2．2 Relationships Between Vocabulary Knowledge and English Comprehensive Ability1．3 Theoretical Framework1．3．1 The History of the Development of the Language Testing1．3．2 Terms Concerning Language Testing1．3．3 Language Testing in EFL Teaching and Learning1．4 Research Methodology1．4．1 Research Questions1．4．2 Participants1．4．3 Instruments1．4．4 Data Collection1．4．5 Data Processing1．5 Results and Discussions1．5．1 Statistics Analysis of the Relationship of Different Variables1．5．2 Discussion About Students’ Vocabulary Knowledge and English Comprehensive Ability1．6 Conclusions1．6．1 Major Findings1．6．2 Pedagogical Implication of the Current Research1．6．3 Limitation of the Current Research1．6．4 Suggestions for Future ResearchChapter Two On Syntactic Complexity and Semantic Cohesion inArgumentative Writings of Chinese and American CollegeStudents2．1 Introduction2．1．1 Research Background2．1．2 Research Purposes2．1．3 Research Significance2．1．4 Organization of This Chapter2．2 Literature Review2．2．1 Previous Studies on Syntactic Complexity2．2．2 Previous Studies on Latent Semantic Analysis2．2．3 Previous Studies by Using Coh-Metrix2．2．4 Previous Studies by Using L2 Syntactic Complexity Analyzer （L2SCA）2．2．5 Summary2．3 Theoretical Framework2．3．1 Theories on Corpus Linguistics2．3．2 Theories on Syntactic Complexity2．3．3 Theories on LSA2．3．4 Theories on Argumentative Writings2．4 Research Methodology2．4．1 Research Questions2．4．2 Research Instruments2．4．3 Research Procedure2．4．4 Data Collection and Data Analysis2．5 Results and Discussions2．5．1 Differences in Indices2．5．2 Correlations Between Measures and Writing Quality”2．5．3 Summary2．6 Conclusions2．6．1 Major Findings of This Study2．6．2 Implications of This Study2．6．3 Limitations of This Study2．6．4 Suggestions for Further StudyAppendixBibliography